The dynamic semantics describes what a statically valid program does when it is evaluated. Its judgements relate a phrase, against a background of bindings and a store, to the value it produces and the store it leaves behind. Where the static semantics abstracted away from values and kept only their types, here the types fall away and the values themselves take the stage.
5.1Values and Objects
A value is what an expression evaluates to. The values of Nex are:
- scalars—integers, reals, characters, booleans, and strings—each an immutable value of the corresponding scalar class;
- the null reference
nil; - object references, written \(\ell\): pointers into the store at which mutable objects—instances of user classes, arrays, maps, sets, tasks, and channels—reside;
- closures, the values of anonymous and named functions, pairing a parameter list and body with the bindings of definition.
An object is a mutable record held in the store. It carries its
class—needed for dynamic dispatch, for match, and for
convert—and a map from field names to values. Scalars and
nil are not objects and are not stored; two scalar values are
identical exactly when they are equal, which is why == and
= coincide on them (Section 5.4).
5.2The Dynamic Environment
Evaluation takes place against a dynamic environment consisting of
- a set of bindings \(E\), mapping each identifier in scope to
a value (or, for an assignable local or field, to the value it currently
holds); these bindings also record the current object, the value of
this, and within a routine with a result, the cellresult; - a store \(s\), mapping object references to objects.
We write \(E(x)\) for the value bound to \(x\), \(E\langle x \mapsto v\rangle\) for \(E\) with \(x\) rebound to \(v\), and \(E + \{x \mapsto v\}\) for \(E\) extended with a new binding. For the store, \(s(\ell)\) is the object at \(\ell\); \(s\langle \ell.f \mapsto v\rangle\) is \(s\) with the field \(f\) of that object updated to \(v\); and \(s + \{\ell \mapsto o\}\), for \(\ell\) fresh, is \(s\) extended with a new object \(o\).
The principal judgement of the chapter is
Statements are evaluated by the analogous judgement \(s, E \vdash \mathit{stmt} \Rightarrow E', s'\), which may extend the bindings (with a new local) and alters the store. Evaluation may also terminate exceptionally; that mode is treated in Section 5.7. Because Nex is deterministic and sequential apart from explicit tasks (Chapter 6), the store is threaded strictly left to right through every rule.
5.3Evaluation of Expressions
Constants, variables, and the current object
A constant denotes its value and leaves the store untouched; this
yields the current object (rules 5.1, 5.3 in Appendix D). A variable is
looked up in the bindings:
The lookup walks the chain of enclosing scopes, so that a name resolves to its nearest binding (Section 5.8 on shadowing).
Operators
An arithmetic or comparison operator evaluates its operands left to right and
then applies the operation of the operands’ class. Equality comes in two
kinds. Value equality \(=\) compares contents: two collections are
equal when their elements are equal; two objects, by the equals
routine of their class, which user classes may override. Identity
equality \(==\) compares references: two object values are identical exactly when
they are the same reference \(\ell\). On scalars the two kinds agree. An operator
evaluates both operands, threading the store, and applies the operation their
classes associate with \(\odot\) (rule 5.4 in Appendix D).
let a: Integer := 7
let b: Real := 2.0
print(a + b)
The operands have different numeric classes; the Integer is
admitted where a Real is wanted, the sum is taken as a
Real, and the value printed is 9.0. This widening is the
one implicit numeric coercion of the language (Section 4.3).
On Integer operands the operation is checked. Write
\(\odot_{\mathbb{Z}}\) for the exact operation in \(\mathbb{Z}\); rule (5.4)
applies precisely when its result lies in range. An arithmetic operation whose
exact result overflows the 64-bit range raises Arithmetic_Overflow,
and integer division or remainder by a zero divisor raises
Division_by_Zero (rules 5.4a, 5.4b in Appendix D; §B.3).
On Real operands the operation is total: division by zero is
not exceptional but yields the IEEE 754 value \(\pm\infty\) or
NaN through \(\widehat\odot\) in rule (5.4), as
§B.3 records. The asymmetry—integer division by zero raises, real
division by zero does not—is deliberate and holds on every back end.
Short-circuit conjunction and disjunction
The operators and and or are not evaluated
by (5.4): their second operand is evaluated only conditionally. This holds in
every back end of Nex and is part of the language’s definition, not an
optimisation. When \(e_1\) is false, \(e_1\) and \(e_2\)
is false and \(e_2\) is never evaluated; otherwise the result is
\(e_2\) (rules 5.5, 5.6 in Appendix D).
Disjunction is dual: in \(e_1\) or \(e_2\), the operand \(e_2\) is
evaluated only when \(e_1\) is false. A consequence is that a guard
such as x /= nil and x.f never evaluates x.f when
x is nil, and is therefore safe.
Member access and the safe access
An ordinary access \(e.f\) reads the field \(f\) of the object at the reference
\(e\) denotes. The safe access \(e\,?.f\) yields nil when \(e\) is
nil and reads the field otherwise (rules 5.7–5.9 in
Appendix D).
An ordinary access \(e.f\) on a nil receiver has no rule: it
raises an exception (Section 5.7). The safe access \(e\,?.f\) instead yields
nil, which is why its static type is optional (Section 4.4).
5.4Calls and Dynamic Dispatch
A method call evaluates the receiver and the arguments, selects the routine by
the runtime class of the receiver and the number of arguments, and
evaluates its body in fresh bindings for the parameters and
this.
class Shape
create make() do end
feature
area(): Real do result := 0.0 end
end
class Square
inherit Shape
create make(s: Real) do side := s end
feature
side: Real
area(): Real do result := side * side end
end
let sh: Shape := create Square.make(3.0)
print(sh.area())
Although sh has static type Shape, the object
it denotes is a Square; \(\mathit{lookup}\) in (5.10) selects on
\(\mathit{class}(o)\), so Square’s area runs and the
result is 9.0, not 0.0. This is dynamic dispatch.
Three features of this rule deserve note. The routine is chosen by \(\mathit{class}(o)\), the class of the actual object, not by the static type of \(e\): this is dynamic dispatch, and is how an overriding routine in a subclass takes effect. The selection also depends on \(n\), realising overloading by arity (Section 4.4). And \(E_0\) is the bindings of the routine’s definition extended with the parameter bindings—not the caller’s bindings—so a routine sees the fields of its object and its own parameters, and nothing of the caller’s locals.
The return value \(\mathit{ret}\) is the final contents of the
result cell for a routine that declares a result, and the
distinguished void value otherwise. A free-function call \(m(e_1,\dots,e_n)\)
and the application of a closure are evaluated likewise, the closure supplying
its captured bindings in place of \(E_0\).
5.5Object Creation and Constructors
Creation allocates a fresh object, gives each field its initial value, runs the
named constructor, checks the precondition of the constructor and the class
invariant, and yields the new reference. The initial value of a field is
nil for an optional
field, and the zero value for a field of scalar type. A non-optional
reference field has no such default: by the attachment rule of
Section 4.9 the constructor must itself assign it, so that the object is
fully attached when creation completes.
class Account
create make(b: Real) do balance := b end
feature
balance: Real
invariant
non_negative: balance >= 0.0
end
let acct := create Account.make(100.0)
print(acct.balance)
Creation allocates a fresh object, runs make to set
balance, then checks the invariant non_negative at the
new reference before yielding it; the value printed is 100.0. Had the
constructor left balance negative, (5.11) would raise a
contract-violation at creation rather than return an inconsistent object.
A constructor may assign the once fields of its class; once the
constructor returns, those fields are fixed for the life of the object
(Section 4.5 enforces this statically, and the store offers no rule to
reassign them). When the create form names no constructor, an object
with default field values is produced and only the invariant is checked.
5.6Contract Checking
Contracts are checked as the program runs, and their violation is an
exceptional event distinct from an ordinary error. The auxiliary
\(\mathit{check}(a)\) evaluates the assertion \(a\); if it yields
true, evaluation proceeds; if false, a
contract-violation exception is raised, carrying the assertion’s
label and its position so that the failure can be reported as which
condition failed on which line.
For a routine \(m\) with precondition \(\mathit{pre}\), postcondition \(\mathit{post}\), and enclosing class invariant \(I\):
- \(\mathit{pre}\) is checked on entry, after the parameters are bound but before the body runs; a failed precondition is the caller’s fault.
- The
oldexpressions of \(\mathit{post}\) are snapshotted on entry: for eachold\(f\) the current value of the field \(f\) is recorded, to be supplied when \(\mathit{post}\) is later evaluated. - \(\mathit{post}\) is checked on normal exit, with
resultbound and the recordedoldvalues in scope; a failed postcondition is the routine’s fault. - \(I\) is checked on exit from every routine and constructor that can be called from outside the object, so that an instance is consistent whenever it is observable.
class Account
create make() do balance := 0.0 end
feature
balance: Real
withdraw(amount: Real)
require
enough: amount <= balance
do
balance := balance - amount
end
end
let acct := create Account.make()
acct.withdraw(50.0)
The precondition enough is checked on entry to
withdraw, after amount is bound. Here the balance is
0.0, so the assertion is false and \(\mathit{check}\) raises a
contract-violation that names the failing condition — reported as
Precondition violation: enough. A failed precondition is the
caller’s fault, and the label is what makes the report point to the cause.
old captures
The snapshot of old \(f\) records the value the field
held on entry. For a field of scalar or reference type this is exactly the
pre-state value; but for a mutable object reached through the field,
the snapshot is the reference, not a copy, so a later mutation of that object
is visible through old. A postcondition that must speak of the
prior size of a mutable collection should therefore record that size
in a field of its own, and refer to old of that field. This is a
consequence of (5.7) and the reference nature of objects, not a special rule.
5.7Exceptions: raise, rescue, retry
Evaluation of a phrase either completes normally, yielding a value and a
store, or terminates exceptionally, carrying an exception value and a
store. An exception propagates outward through enclosing phrases—abandoning
their pending work—until a rescue clause catches it. We write
the exceptional outcome \(s, E \vdash e \Rightarrow \mathbf{raise}\;w,\, s'\).
The statement raise \(e\) evaluates \(e\) to a value \(w\) and
raises it. A nil dereference, a failed contract, a failed runtime
argument check, and a failed convert in a context requiring success
all raise built-in exception values by the same mechanism (the raise
statement is rule 5.12 in Appendix D).
A scoped block do \(\mathit{block}_1\) rescue
\(\mathit{block}_2\) end runs \(\mathit{block}_1\); if it completes
normally, the rescue is ignored (rule 5.13 in Appendix D); if it
raises \(w\), the handler \(\mathit{block}_2\) is run with exception
bound to \(w\):
class Worker
create make() do attempts := 0 end
feature
attempts: Integer
run()
do
do
attempts := attempts + 1
if attempts < 3 then
raise "transient"
end
print(attempts)
rescue
if attempts < 3 then
retry
end
end
end
end
let w := create Worker.make()
w.run()
The first two attempts raise; each time (5.14) runs the handler, which
retrys — abandoning the handler and re-running the block from the
top against the current store (rule 5.15 in Appendix D). On the third attempt
no exception is raised and 3 is printed. retry has meaning
only inside a rescue block (Section 2.9); elsewhere it is a static
error.
If a handler completes without retry, the scoped block completes
normally and execution continues after it; an exception raised by the handler
itself propagates outward in the ordinary way.
5.8Statements and Control Flow
Local declaration, assignment, and scope
A let adds a fresh binding and a field update writes through a
reference into the store (rules 5.16, 5.18 in Appendix D); assignment rebinds
an existing variable to a new value:
A let introduces a new binding in a fresh scope; an assignment
updates an existing one. A scoped block do…end
evaluates its statements in bindings that extend the enclosing ones, so
that a let inside the block shadows an outer binding of the
same name and the outer binding is restored on exit—the bindings made
inside a block do not escape it.
Conditionals and loops
The if statement evaluates its condition and runs the
corresponding branch; the conditional expression when… is its
value-producing analogue. The general loop runs its from block once,
then repeatedly tests the until condition, running the body while the
condition is false (rules 5.19, 5.20 in Appendix D).
let sum: Integer := 0
from let i := 1 until i > 5 do
sum := sum + i
i := i + 1
end
print(sum)
The from block runs once, binding i; then while
i > 5 is false the body runs, each iteration rebinding
sum and i in the threaded store (5.17). After
i reaches 6 the loop stops and 15 is
printed.
A loop may carry an invariant, checked before the body on each
iteration, and a variant—an integer expression that must
strictly decrease and stay non-negative across iterations, checked likewise.
These are contracts on the loop: a violated loop invariant or a non-decreasing
variant raises a contract-violation exception. The counted loop
repeat \(n\) do \(b\) and the cursor loop
across \(e\) as \(x\) do \(b\) are derived
forms, expanded in Appendix C: the former into a general loop over a counter,
the latter into iteration driven by the start/item/next/at_end
protocol of the Cursor class (Appendix B).
Dispatch statements
The case statement compares the value of its scrutinee against the
constants of each clause, by value equality, and runs the first matching clause,
or the else clause if none matches. The match statement
inspects the runtime class of its scrutinee and runs the clause whose class the
object conforms to, binding the clause variable to the object; its
exhaustiveness over a sealed class was guaranteed statically (4.19). The
convert form attempts a cast and binds its variable to the converted
value or to nil, yielding the boolean that the surrounding context
(an if, say) may test.
The host block
The statement with \(s\) do \(b\) end,
where \(s\) is a string literal naming a host facility, is the one
construct whose behaviour is conditioned on the platform beneath the
implementation. When the implementation recognises \(s\), the statements of
\(b\) are evaluated with name resolution extended to that facility: a class
name or call within \(b\) that resolves to no Nex entity may resolve to an
entity of the host. When the implementation does not recognise \(s\), the
entire block is skipped—\(b\) is not evaluated and no error arises. A
program may thus carry host-specific passages that execute only where their
host is present. The JVM implementation recognises the facility
"java": within the block, imported Java classes may be
instantiated and their methods called by the ordinary call syntax, while a call
whose receiver is a Nex value dispatches by the rules of Section 5.4 as it
would outside. Unlike the scoped block do…end,
the host block does not open a scope: a let within it binds in the
enclosing scope and remains visible after the block.
5.9Termination
A normal evaluation of a phrase yields a value and a store; an exceptional one
yields a raised value and a store; a non-terminating one—a loop that never
satisfies its until, an unbounded recursion—yields nothing,
and the judgement simply has no derivation. The Definition makes no claim that
evaluation terminates; it says only what the result is when it does. The
remaining construct of the statement grammar, spawn, begins a
concurrent evaluation and is the subject of Chapter 6.